Echoes and Origins

9 responses to “Incredible Odds!!”

1. 

   mosckerr

   January 28, 2026

   Extending the Jewish Polemic: Rambam’s Assimilation as Parallel to Xtian and Islamic Theological Substitutions. The Rambam Civil War compares to the anarchy in Iran today.

   Building against the foundational critiques of the Xtian false messiah and Muslim false prophet revisionist theologies whereby Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai & Horev introduced ‘New God’ theologies aimed to supplant the oath alliance brit Sinai faith which permanently cuts a brit faith that HaShem ruling in this Earth לא בשמים היא – through the spirits of tohor Oral Torah middot, which permanently dwell and occupy the משל משכן of the Sinai revelation contained and interpreted by the נמשל יצר הטוב within the heart as differentiated by the Torah language of kre’a shma’s: בכל לבבך\לבבכם, as interpreted by rabbi Yechuda.

   Just as the NT and Koran negate the Oral Torah’s dynamic common law in favor of static, universal doctrines—replacing the particularistic local brit with their theological dogmas of “Universal God for all Goyim” — the Rambam’s sh’itta likewise assimilates Greco-Roman statute law and Aristotelian philosophy as a replacement for פרדס logic; specifically through the 7 middot of Hillel, 10 middot of Akiva, 13 middot of Yishmael, and 32 middot of Yossi Galil’s 32 Aggadic middot – building blocks נמשל, which replace logical Case/Rule comparisons to other Case/Rule disputes heard by different courtrooms; with the Torah משל of straw required to make bricks interpreted by the above נמשל of inductive logical comparison to interpret “k’vanna” of time-oriented mitzvot as the definition of Torah wisdom. (That’s quite a mouthful, please don’t choke.)

   The Torah contrasts with how Goyim define idolatry – limited to graven images which the NaCH prophets completely mock in absolute and total derision. Torah negative commandments directly פסול-declare as treif-Jewish assimilation wherein Jews abandon the culture and customs of the chosen Cohen people as established by the sealed מסורת – the T’NaCH, Talmud, Siddur – replaced by Goyim cultures and customs; ultimately resulting in Jewish intermarriage with Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai – the brit of the chosen Cohen people. Forsaking the oath Sinai brit, abandons the 3 oaths sworn by the Avot whereby they eternally father the chosen עולם הבא Cohen seed; it rejects the yoke of the kingdom of heaven which define the k’vanna of tefillah; wherein Israel accepts through tefillen permission to swear Torah oaths which absolutely define the k’vanna and intent of the Written and Oral Torah revelations.

   Assimilated Reshonim scholarship upon the T’NaCH/Talmud\Midrashim failed to arouse Jews to rise up and re-conquer our homelands like as did Herzl’s “Jewish State” political Zionism and Ahad Ha’am’s Cultural Zionism, expressed through his essay titled: “The Jewish State and the Jewish Problem”. A millennium after the Hanukkah Civil War, the Rambam Civil War made a “mishna torah”; but whereas Jews in Israel who can do mitzvot לשמה lit the Menorah lights of victory over the ערב רב Tzeddukim … charisma foreign counter-cultures in g’lut lead by the Rambam in particular and the vast majority of Spanish assimilated Reshonim scholars in general – g’lut Jewry lacks the Yatzir Ha-Tov tohor middot dominance which permits them to likewise observe Torah commandments לשמה – consequent to the Torah curse of g’lut.

   According to the RambaN’s Chumash commentary, g’lut Jewry observe mitzvot primarily as a zikaron (remembrance) of their identity, heritage, and connection to the land of Israel, rather than fulfilling them in their complete and original ideal לשמה. The Ramban acknowledges examples of obvious mitzvot cannot be fully realized when the Jewish people are not in their homeland, particularly those related to the “Temple” משל of the judicial justice נמשל and agricultural laws. Based upon the Talmud’s prioritization of time-oriented k’vanna of tefilla over Cain’s sacrifice as a barbeque to heaven positive Torah commandment which requires no k’vanna. G’lut Jewry directly compare to the ger tzeddik who rejects to do certain Torah commandments; who favors how the Shomronim, Tzeddukim, and Karaim observe Torah as religious ritual law, rather than how the P’rushim, instructors of the Oral Torah masoret, validate the Writtten Torah as the Constitution of the Republic which mandates Oral Torah court room common law to establish the rule of righteous justice in the Cohen eternal inheritance land!

   Off the דרך curse g’lut statute law assimilated Judaism culminated its “Berlin is our new Jerusalem” by duplicating the rebellion of the Wilderness generations who refused to conquer Canaan from fear of giants! Chaim Weizmann in 1937, “Jews of the world, where are you?”, shortly followed up with the White Paper and FDR closing the Golden Medina to Jewish refugees in 1939 & thereafter. The story of the curse Wilderness Generation repeated in the virtual destruction of Western European Jewry in the Nazi gas chambers of three years duration.

   The Rambam’s Mishneh Torah, a systematic code of halacha, represents a departure from the Oral Torah’s common law tradition, which thrives on dialectical debate, precedents, and inductive reasoning as seen in the Gemara’s sugyot. Instead, it adopts a Roman-style statute law format—concise, authoritative rulings without the underlying disputes—mirroring the codified canons of Christianity (e.g., the Nicene Creed’s dogmatic assertions) and Islam (e.g., the Sharia’s fiqh compilations). This negation of the Oral Torah’s fluidity prompted swift condemnation.

   In 1232, the rabbis of northern France, steeped in the Ashkenazi tradition of Rashi (1040–1105) and the Tosafot, issued a ban against studying philosophy, explicitly targeting the Rambam’s works for their rationalist bent. Led by figures like Solomon ben Abraham of Montpellier, this ban was amplified by Rabbeinu Yonah Gerondi (d. 1263), who traveled to gather support, viewing the Rambam’s integration of Aristotelian logic as a threat to traditional Torah study. Rabbeinu Yonah, a relative of Nahmanides (Ramban), initially spearheaded the anti-Maimonidean agitation in Provence and Spain, seeing it as akin to Hellenistic corruption. The French school’s emphasis on Tosafist common law commentaries upon the Talmud denounced the Rambam’s declarative style, which omitted sources and debates, much as the NT & Koran omits Sinai’s context to proclaim a “new covenant,” or “final prophet”.

   This controversy escalated into the Maimonidean Controversies (1232–1305), involving bans and counter-bans across Europe. Rabbeinu Yonah later repented after witnessing the Inquisition burn all the Talmud manuscripts in Paris France in 1242. A disaster which duplicated the dynastic Hashmonean Civil War which pitted Hyrcanus II against Aristobulus II. Both brothers appealed to Roman general Pompey to resolve their dynastic dispute over the Crown. Pompey’s Army marched into Jerusalem unopposed and appointed the Goy Herod as king around 37 BCE. Herod the Idumean a non Jew, Pompey appointed as king. This marked a crucial transition towards Roman hegemony and set the stage for future conflicts and the eventual emergence of early Xtianity within this tumultuous context.

   This controversy escalated into the Maimonidean Controversies (1232–1305), involving bans and counter-bans across Europe. The Rambam’s philosophy risked eroding the mystical and ethical dimensions of Torah. This mirrors the Torah’s negative commandment against foreign worship (Shemot 20:3–5), extended to intellectual idolatry—assimilating Greek logos over prophetic mussar. Just as Xtianity and Islam universalize and supplant their “monotheistic God” detached from Israel’s election, the Rambam’s code likewise imposes a static halacha alien to the living Oral Torah common law פרדס inductive logic expressed through middot models.

   In Hilchot Melachim u’Milchamot 8:10–11, he posits these seven laws—prohibitions against idolatry, blasphemy, murder, theft, sexual immorality, eating a limb from a living animal, and the command to establish courts—as binding on all humanity, enforceable by death for non-compliance. This universal framework echoes Christian and Islamic theologies of a singular, accessible God for all peoples, framing monotheism as a global imperative rather than Israel’s particular oath brit which תמיד מעשה בראשית through time-oriented Avot commandments creates the chosen Cohen people יש מאין – comparable to the Ger Tzeddik. Rambam elevates Noahide observance to grant non-Jews status as “chasidei umot ha’olam” (righteous of the nations) if accepted due to divine command, despite the limitation of the jurisdiction of Sanhedrin courts limited only to the boundaries of the Jewish State!

   The Aggada of mesechta Sanhedrin limits the 7 mitzvot bnai noach unto the gere toshav Goyim living within the borders of the land. Mesechta Baba Kama limits the exclusion of all legal rights to the Shomronim “new Israel impostors who “converted out of fear” just as did Herod; both mesechtot Sanhedrin and Baba Kama base their instruction on D’varim which instructs Israel to either give treif flesh to the ger toshav or sell that flesh to the Na’cree. Sanhedrin refers to the ger toshav as bnai noach. Whereas Baba Kama describes the despised “Samaritan charlatans” as Canaani.

   Rambam’s view assimilates a “universal God,” akin to Christianity’s Trinity or Islam’s Tawhid, violating the Torah’s distinction: HaShem’s Name is revealed solely through Israel’s brit (Shemot 6:3). He even praises Islam as non-idolatrous monotheism (Hilchot Teshuvah 3:7), while deeming Xtianity idolatrous, yet both alien religions equally share the av tuma universalist avoda zara ONE GOD abomination. This “monotheistic universalism” negates the Oral Torah’s focus on Israel’s role as or l’goyim through prophetic mussar.

   Xtianity defines prophesy as witchcraft fortune telling. Whereas the Koran declares that Allah sends prophets to all nations and those prophets speak the native tongue of the nations . The Arab nation being the last nation to receive its prophet’s warnings. This negates the prophet Yonah sent to Assyria! His mussar rebuked g’lut 10 tribes not the kingdom of Assyria whom the Babylonian empire almost immediately thereafter conquered. Rambam’s rationalism offers no mussar for suffering, paralleling the absent Jesus or Allah. His fiat halacha does not remotely compare to the Prosecution vs Defense courtroom setting which the Gemara models.

   Led by figures like Solomon ben Abraham of Montpellier, this ban was amplified by Rabbeinu Yonah Gerondi (d. 1263), who traveled to gather support, they viewed the Rambam’s integration of Aristotelian logic as a threat to traditional Torah study. Both the rabbeinu Yonah’s court in Spain and the common law school of Rashi/Tosafot in France placed a ban upon the Rambam’s assimilated to Greek/Roman legal customs: statute law halachic fiat codification which negated Oral Torah “commodity based” common law–much as does both the NT and Koran. Rabbeinu Yonah later repented after witnessing the Inquisition burn Rambam’s books in 1233 and after the Goyim torched all the Talmud found in France. He interpreted these “disasters” as divine retribution for his zeal. Nonetheless, the initial ban against the study of Greek philosophy stands in Yeshiva education unto this very day, as a bulwark against assimilation.

   For example a defining פרט to the previous paragraph’s כלל – Rambam’s perverted views on Noahide laws. The Rambam assimilated, a direct Torah negative commandment, and embraced the Xtian & Muslim theologies of God – framed as a Monotheistic Universal God; his Roman statute law halacha and Greek Aristotle philosophy clashes with the Talmud which teaches that only the 12 Tribes of Israel accepted the Written Torah at Sinai and the Oral Torah at Horev. The Rambam replaced the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס inductive dynamic logic with Aristotles static deductive logic – absolutely identical as did the Tzeddukim 1000 years previous during the Hanukkah Jewish Civil War.

   The Rambam, influenced by Aristotle’s Organon, employs deductive logic in his philosophical work: Moreh Nevuchim. There he reduces prophetic mussar perverted to intellectual perfection, much like his posok halacha of the av Mishna Chullin touching the אפיקורוס slaughter of animals as lacking knowledge and understanding of the true essence of Jewish teachings. The Rambam Greek philosophy prioritizes intellect as the highest human faculty. The Talmud by contrast instructs that יראת שמים serves as the foundation of faith. This Torah rebuke applied to the ערב רב – שאין להם יראת אלהים as the root cause of the Torah curse of Amalek throughout the generations.

   Just as the Tzeddukim denied resurrection and angels to align with Greek thought, Rambam reinterprets miracles and eschatology allegorically, clashing with Kabbalistic traditions like the Zohar. But the mitzva of Shabbat which forbids doing acts of wisdom known specifically as מלאכה and generally as time-oriented commandments! Doing מלאכה repressed through time-oriented commandment create מלאכים שברא יש מאין; based upon the precedent that Yaacov sent מלאכים unto his brother Esav and wrestled in turn with the מלאך of his brother!

   This substitution negates the tohor middot spirits animating the yetzer ha-tov, reducing Torah to intellectual exercise. Christianity’s logos (John 1:1) and Islam’s kalam theology similarly adopt Aristotelian deduction, supplanting Sinai’s inductive mussar. The bans by Rabbeinu Yonah and the French schools affirm: True Torah resists such assimilation, prioritizing Sanhedrin common law over codified fiat statute law. As a commodity based currency day & night different from fiat monopoly play-game board funny money so too and how much more so Torah common law/משנה תורה rejects fiat statute roman laws; which extend to intellectual idolatry—assimilating Greek logos over prophetic mussar.

   Hence in summation: The foundational critiques of the Xtian false messiah (JeZeus) and Muslim false prophet (Muhammad) revisionist theologies stand firm: Goyim who rejected the dual revelation of the Written Torah at Sinai and Oral Torah at Horev fabricated “New God” theologies to supplant the eternal oath alliance brit of Sinai. This Sinai oath brit/alliance alone cuts the faith of justice wherein HaShem dwells permanently through the spirits of tohor Oral Torah middot in the משל משכן of the Sinai revelation, interpreted by the נמשל yetzer ha-tov within the heart—as differentiated by the Torah language of kriyat Shema (“בכל לבבך/לבבכם”), per Rabbi Yehuda’s interpretation emphasizing the whole heart’s tohor intent.

   Rambam’s sh’iita assimilates Greco-Roman statute law as the basis\priority which defines his statute halacha which makes secondary the language of the Talmud which his code translates into Hebrew. Common law – no translation can duplicate – because common law requires precedents. Rambam’s code relies upon foreign imports of Greek syllogism deductive logic which lacks the means to inductively compare ever changing halacha based upon ever changing life conditions throughout the generations. Just as the bible translations of בראשית fail to account for the רמזים of ב’ ראשית, ברית אש, and ראש בית, so too and how much more so static fiat halachic codes fail to employ Gemara halachot as precedents whereby scholarship through the generations can re-interpret the language of the Mishna based upon different perspectives suitable for the times and generations.

   The Rambam’s sh’itta assimilates Greco-Roman statute law and Aristotelian philosophy as a replacement for פרדס logic. The Torah משל of straw required to make bricks finds its נמשל in inductive logical comparison to interpret k’vanna of time-oriented mitzvot, defining Torah מלאכה wisdom, which the Rambam totally failed to grasp much less prioritize and understand. The downfall of the ‘Golden Age of Spain’ resulted from Jewish assimilation/intermarriage.

   Torah “idolatry” (a gross erroneous translation) far exceeds Goyim’s graven images (mocked derisively by Nevi’im). It encompasses any Jewish assimilation where Jews abandon the sealed mesorah culture and customs of the chosen Cohen people—T’NaCH, Talmud, Siddur—and favor/approve of Goyim cultures, customs, and intermarriage with those rejecting Sinai’s brit, like have themselves. This forsakes the 3 oaths sworn by the Avot to father the chosen Cohen seed and rejects the yoke of Heaven’s kingdom in tefillah, where tefillin oaths affirm Written and Oral Torah revelations.

   Assimilated Rishonim scholarship on T’NaCH/Talmud/Midrashim failed to arouse Jews to reconquer the homeland, unlike Herzl’s political Zionism (“Der Judenstaat”) and Ahad Ha’am’s cultural Zionism in his essay “The Jewish State and the Jewish Problem” (1897/98), which critiqued purely political approaches for neglecting spiritual/cultural revival. A millennium after the Hanukkah Civil War against Tzeddukim assimilation, the Rambam Civil War produced the “Mishneh Torah”—a statute law fiat codex. By logical דיוק contrasts with Israel performs mitzvot l’shmah raised the Menorah lights of victory over the Erev Rav Tzeddukim and foreign counter-cultures. Galut Jewry, cursed by the Torah’s galut decree (Vayikra 26, Devarim 28), lacks yetzer ha-tov tohor middot dominance to observe commandments l’shmah.

   The off the דרך Orthodox Judaism confuses the 3 vows: 1. Not to Attempt to Conquer the Land 2. Not to Rebel Against the Nations 3. God Will Bring Them Back prioritized over the 3 oaths sworn by the Avot which eternally create the chosen Cohen people through time oriented מלאכה חכמה. This mesechta of Ketubot simply does not supersede the Torah obligation to conquer the land. Moshe qualifies as the av model of Moshiach, and he did not general the war by which Israel fought multiple wars to conquer Canaan!

   This off-the-derech galut statute-law assimilated Judaism culminated in “Berlin is our new Jerusalem,” duplicating the Wilderness generation’s rebellion—refusing to conquer Canaan from fear of giants, absolutely no different from the prophetic mussar where the Shomronim converted for fear of lions or Herod’s “inquisition like” convertion – for fear of his life. Rambam’s fiat halachic משל currency counterfeit fails to “weave” halachic ritualism which requires no k’vanna together as with “gold” aggadic prophetic mussar as the time-oriented commandment k’vanna which makes aliya of secondary commandment to Av time-oriented commandments and results in the garments worn by the chosen Cohen people נמשל to the Cohen garments worn by Aaron and his sons משל.

   Roman “fiat currency” statute law—concise authoritative rulings without disputes—forms the basis of Middle Ages Roman Catholic Church Canon Law. The Rambam code duplicates Catholic dogmatism and Islamic Sharia fiqh compilations. Rabbeinu Yonah (d. 1263, relative of Ramban) amplified the agitation in Provence/Spain, viewing Aristotelian integration as Hellenistic corruption akin to Tzeddukim. The French school’s Tosafist precedent pilpul denounced Rambam’s declarative style omitting sources/debates, much as NT/Koran omit Sinai context for “new covenant” or “final prophet” substitute theology/revisionist history. All Torah prophets command mussar. Torah prophets not required to speak in Goyim languages because Goyim never accept to this very day the revelation of the Torah at Sinai & Horev.

   The Rambam’s gross error in the Av Mishna of Chullin matched by his equally stupid error in Kiddushin wherein his halacha declares, ignorant of the Gemarah רבוי מיעט-קמ”ל which excludes young girls as fit for the mitzva of kiddushin, just as the Av Mishna excludes Chuppa; or his halachot of Shabbat which fails to distinguish between the two verbs מלאכה כנגד עבודה. As commodity-based currency (day/night value) differs from fiat monopoly funny money, so too—and infinitely more so—Torah common law/Mishneh Torah rejects fiat Roman statute law Caesar decrees which forcibly expelled Jews from Judea and resulted in an 2000+ year Jewish g’lut which the Rambam code grossly emulates.

   Assimilated Rambam and his rabbinic ilk directly compare to the disaster of Herod! This disgraceful Civil War serves as proof that g’lut Jewry in those dreadful days – totally failed to due t’shuva. The shame of this disgrace compares to the betrayal of the British White Paper and FDR closing the borders of the Golden Medina to Jewish refugees attempting to flee from Nazi sub-human barbarians. Match only by the cold-blooded Allied calculation which sacrificed the Jewish people upon the Goyim altar of war – their refusal to bomb the Nazi rail lines which lead to the Death Camps.

   Loading…

   Reply
   1. 

      Tim Bowling

      February 1, 2026

      I won’t pretend I’ve read this. I don’t mean to belittle you, but this is a Kamala Harris word salad. If you would like me to congratulate you on the number of words I had no idea the meaning of, then you truly deserve congratulations. If you were actually trying to make a point on the other hand, your target I’m afraid, was behind you.

      Loading…

      Reply
      1. 

         mosckerr

         February 1, 2026

         Greetings Mr. Bowling, I accept your rhetorical dismissal/refusal of engagement; accusations of incoherence rhetoric.

         I understand if the piece was too dense for a comment-thread read, but dismissing it as “word salad” isn’t a critique — it’s an admission you chose not to engage the argument. The essay makes a specific claim: that replacing Torah’s inductive, case-based Oral Law with universal, codified systems (whether Christian, Islamic, or Maimonidean) fundamentally alters Judaism’s covenantal logic. You’re free to disagree with that thesis, but calling complexity incoherence avoids addressing it. If you want a shorter version, I’m happy to provide one — but reducing engagement to an insult says more about the reader’s patience than the argument’s substance.

         Loading…
      2. 

         Tim Bowling

         February 1, 2026

         Number one: To be perfectly honest, some of the things you are claiming in your thesis is just rambling. I don’t need to be talked down to; a lot of what you wrote is in Hebrew. If you want me to acknowledge you’re a lot smarter than me, you got it: I admit I can’t read this stuff much less understand it. But as the New Testament says,”For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called: 27 But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; 28 And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are:” – 1 Corinthians 1:26-28 KJV
         Now my friend and I do mean that; if you would like to learn about how the Bible predicted that the Jewish people would reject their Messiah, how the Bible has written the history of the Jewish people and the nation of Israel in advance, and how both New Testament and Old Testament prophecies are coming to pass in a convergence like I’ve never seen before, I would consider it an honor to tell you these things: But I cannot, not won’t but can’t get involved in Oral tradition, mystic teachings, and I definitely don’t care about any other false religions like Islam. This is exactly what God said the Jews would do! “9 And he said, Go, and tell this people,
         Hear ye indeed, but understand not;
         and see ye indeed, but perceive not.
         10 Make the heart of this people fat,
         and make their ears heavy, and shut their eyes;
         lest they see with their eyes,
         and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and convert, and be healed.” – Isaiah 6:9-10
         Jesus is your Messiah: It’s really that simple and you don’t need a masters degree to find it. All it takes is a humble attitude, a measure of faith, and a confession: “That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. 10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. 11 For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. 12 For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.” Romans 10:9-12 I invite you now, my friend, to find the thing your soul is searching for, and that is answers. They are not found in the teachings of men, nor are they found in the writings of those who have lost their way. They are found in the one and only true Word of God, your Tanakh, what we refer to the Old Testament, and the New Testament. These are Jewish writings, not gentile. Your people wrote both volumes and they are written for you first; and then the gentiles.

         Loading…
      3. 

         mosckerr

         February 2, 2026

         Tim, greetings to you. While born in America made aliya back in 1991 to Israel and built my life here. 2000+ years of Jewish exile from our homeland means that I do not leave the country. Yes their are a couple of exceptions where I went to my daughters wedding in NY and visited my son who lives in London. But beside those exceptions I personally do not leave Israel.

         Goyim do not determine my family members and how much more so Torah concepts of mitzvot, Moshiach a Torah commandment and Goyim are not under the law according to your apostle Paul.

         Paul did not write clearly because T’NaCH & Talmudic common law not the same as Roman Statute law a huge ooooops. You do not speak not Hebrew & not Aramaic – the language of the T’NaCH & Talmud. You want to believe your pie in the sky God JeZeus more power to ya. But post Shoah – by their fruits you shall know them – Xtianity a stinking dead religion.

         Loading…
      4. 

         mosckerr

         February 2, 2026

         So many things wrong with your abhorrent old testament bad/evil mistranslations. But honestly it appears your addicted to the Roman NT Elders of Zion forgery so I will not elaborate unless asked.

         Loading…
      5. 

         mosckerr

         February 3, 2026

         Howdy Tim having a parallel conversation with another Xtian. Perhaps it might interest you.

         Having a discussion with a Xtian religious fanatic who assumes that Xtianity determines and shapes the rules by which Judaism exists.

         etb. your final comment – not a refutation of what I introduced. Its a my way or the highway declaration. You & I never in the same domain; Xtianity has no part with Torah. As a Xtian your theology avoda zara spins around NT-theism/Protestant academic epistemology. You slavishly anchor your theology in peshat. But peshat does not exist divorced from drosh; Adam & Eve a paired couple Ooops. The chief flaw of Xtianity – it limits the reality of the Gods to 3-D history. LOL Torah commands mussar not history. Oooops. Bottom line: Xtianity evaluated as textual continuity, not halakhic legitimacy

         Your invocation of procedural failure (“flooding,” “no shared method,” “manifesto”) as your exit retreat reminds me of a dog running away with its tail between its legs peeing all over itself. By your “rules” (Xtianity does not impose rules upon Israeli Jews) of “flooding: I failed to: isolate a single narrow thesis, redefined terms unilaterally, expanded scope faster than you could respond, & used mockery where you demanded analytic restraint. Hence “A continually expanding manifesto…” — is procedurally accurate inside your paradigm.

         Your core assumptions – false. 1. Shared method is required for truth. 2. Peshat has veto power. 3. History is the foundation of obligation. 4. Theology can be adjudicated without the oaths sworn by the Avot which created the chosen Cohen people from Torah time-oriented commandments. The Oral Torah precisely rejects all 4 false Goyim theological premises. Why? Because Xtianity treats the Torah as a text they can argue about. Wrong. Goyim never once ever accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Just that simple, no fancy dancing. The sworn oaths of the avot and the revelation of HaShem in this Earth rather than in the Heavens – not a subject open to debate.

         Xtianity in general and you in particular openly reject the Sanhedrin logic which begins with: “Who is authorized to speak within this court?” Torah Courts permit only judicial opinions, which disqualifies you from the start. For example your gross ignorance of peshat — when you declare: “You dismiss peshat when it disagrees with you…”, simply bat-shit crazy false. Peshat fits hand in glove with drosh. Rabbi Akiva taught this kabbalah which you know nothing about.

         Peshat ≠ final authority; simply not the final authority in Torah hermeneutics. “Lo bashamayim hi” explicitly de-centers textual literalism. So your pie in the sky declaration “If peshat is dismissed, all else collapses”, simply a joke. LOL Xtian textual ontology of Protestant Higher Criticism. Such early 20th Century nonsense of philosophy that studies the nature of being, existence, and reality, has no portion or part in the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev — especially rejected and abhorred post Shoah – By their Fruits you shall know them. You remain stuck in your dead religion, on par with having sex with a dead body. As a religious exile your stuck waiting for the 2nd coming of your God.

         Universal monotheism ≠ Torah faith. Xtianity stands outside the Sinai legal universe. Textual continuity does not equal to the Torah commandment for the chosen Cohen people to eternally remember the oaths sworn by the Avot by which they cut the oath brit time-oriented commandment wherein the generations of their seed forever create the chosen cohen people from nothing. At Sinai/Horev Israel accepted by means of the נעשה\נשמע oaths – We accepted the Written and Oral Torah as one revelation לשמה.

         Xtianity Non-Sinaitic readers can adjudicate Torah meaning — Bunk. Xtianity never had any jurisdictional arguments – ever. Not by Paul, nor by JeZeus, and most certainly not by you. Sanhedrin common law courtrooms in no way shape or form compare to a university seminar any more that a person can choose his gender at birth. XX does not change to XY because an “it” desires such.

         Loading…
      6. 

         Tim Bowling

         February 3, 2026

         Believe it or not, this time I read it, and with the help of Ai, I understood it. Here’s my reply: 1 – how sad it must be. I genuinely feel sorry for you. All you have is your intellect, and your writings. Your ideas and reasoning are as cold as your heart. You don’t just disagree with Christianity, but you hate it, you hate the person Jesus and even go as far as to mock him, which is exactly what he said you would do. Jesus said if the world hates you, know that it hated me first. If there is anyone truly dangerous, its you. You are worldly intelligent, but spiritually void. You write as someone who is filled with hate, not as someone who is showing the love of God. Do you even know how many words I had to ask definitions for? And some of the phrases you used were so self-contradictory, even Ai questioned what you meant. If you honestly think your writings are well made points to counter the Christian narrative, you are deluding yourself. Here is one comment Ai said about your writing:
         “Intellectually serious but pastorally poor communicator
         Underneath the overload of jargon and abuse, there is a serious thesis: Torah as an oath-based, court-centered legal civilization fundamentally incompatible with universalizing, creed-based religions. But the way it’s written—dense, jargon-heavy, and mocking—almost guarantees that most Christians will hear only insult and obscurity.”
         Ai is right: You don’t intend to convince me of anything; your intention is to cloak your hatred of me and Christians in general. Yet I sit here day after day, praying for you and people like you. I once met a Jew; that’s right, once. I live in rural Kentucky, we don’t have any Jews here that I know of. He was the hardest person to get along with that I ever knew. I had to constantly remind myself that the reason he is the way he is because God had declared it from the beginning. Everywhere Jews have set their foot in this world they have become the object of scorn and hatred. And the more annoying this man became, the more compassion I had for him. Remember this: God is Love. He’s not in some overloaded jargon of complicated ideologies. You’re not going to find God in those writings of yours. Because he’s no longer there. It is really amazing once you think about it! It truly is. The Bible is coming true right in front of your eyes and you still can’t even see it! With all your education and all your reading, you are still just as blind as God said you would be! When Jesus died on the cross, the veil in the temple separating the Holy of Holies from the world split in two, top to bottom. Because God wasn’t separated from his people any more. But when the Jews rejected their Messiah, as your book of Isaiah 65:1 says, – “I revealed myself to those who did not ask for me; I was found by those who did not seek me.”
         As far as your comments here. For some reason, you were in the spam folder: I thought it was a mistake; but now I think you probably were messaging others who got tired of your long winded arguments and decided to put you in the spam folder. While I will acknowledge you have a right to express your opinion, you have no right to do it on my blog. You are on WordPress.com and you probably have your own blog. So take your hate-filled diatribes with you and post your opinions where someone will read them and appreciate them, for they are no longer welcome here. You said you wouldn’t elaborate unless asked, and I didn’t reply to you. But here you are elaborating. This will be posted in the replies, but this is the end. No more comments of yours will be read or posted on my blog.

         Loading…
      7. 

         mosckerr

         February 3, 2026

         Torah mitzvot shaped and determined through Sanhedrin common law lateral courtrooms בלבד. The Torah’s system of mitzvot—both d’oraita and d’rabbanan—finds its authoritative determination exclusively through the lateral common law deliberations of the Sanhedrin. Torah common law never exists as statute law as expressed through independent legislators annulling or innovating mitzvot outside courtroom jurisdiction.

         The rejection of bat kol in mesechta Bava Metzia 59b (the tanur shel Akhnai) crystallizes this: “Lo ba-shamayim hi” (Devarim 30:12) means post-Sinai, halacha follows majority human reasoning in beit din, not heavenly voices or charismatic claims. Prophets courtroom justice enforcers independently enforce or rebuke. They do not legislate or override courts of Sanhedrin Common law.

         Acts 16:16-40 Necromancy = seeking authority, knowledge, or salvation from the dead. If a human who died becomes: prayed to; invoked; obeyed; trusted over Torah law — then functionally, it is דורש אל המתים, regardless of metaphysical claims. The NT’s moshiach narrative, ignores the core: Leading in “war” (crises) to uphold courtroom restitution (e.g., Sanhedrin as nimshal to Beit HaMikdash’s mashal).

         The Torah Law mitzva of Moshiach, this mitzva applies equally to all Jews in all generations. The Torah mitzva of Moshiach exists as an expression of a servant, like Moshe and all the NaCH prophets, of Torah common law court police enforcers. The Book of Shmuel does not make king David into a theological belief system ‘new covenant’ God. Mesechta Baba Metzia :נט reject the authority of a בת קול voice from heaven as having any judicial authority on this Earth.

         Acts 16:16–18 is not a neutral miracle story. It is a classic confrontation between Torah-prohibited practices and a pagan economic system. Encounter with the Slave Girl (Verses 16-18)/witch. The girl is explicitly described as having a πνεῦμα πύθωνα — a Python spirit, tied in Greek culture to Delphi, Apollo, and divination.

         The act of Paul commanding the spirit to depart from the girl in Acts 16 can spark discussions about necromancy, witchcraft, and the broader context of spiritual authority. The accusation against Paul and Silas reflects a significant cultural conflict. They were promoting a different way of life that challenged local practices, including those tied to economic interests. The girl’s ability to tell fortunes, considered a source of income for her owners, was rooted in practices the Jewish Torah condemned.

         This maps cleanly onto אוב וידעוני in Torah language (Devarim 18). Paul’s act is not prophetic justice. But rather an extrajudicial charismatic intervention, devoid of Sanhedrin authority, witnesses, or jurisdiction. This prophetic mussar interprets this av tuma story as an unlicensed manipulation of spiritual forces outside of Torah courtroom common law. As such this NT story more counter-witchcraft rather than prophetic mussar which the Torah commands.

         The concept of resurrection in Xtianity indeed provokes a variety of interpretations and discussions, especially when viewed in the context of the Hebrew Scriptures (Torah) and traditional Jewish beliefs. The Torah does not explicitly describe resurrection in the way that later Xtian dogmatism does. There are sections of T’NaCH משל and Aggadic/Midrashic examination of the mystic work of the Book of Daniel 12:2 (Many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to reproaches, to everlasting abhorrence”) – often read midrashically or kabbalistically through halachic lenses. However this סוד kabbalah interpreted through the lenses of halacha, defines how פרדס רמז\סוד weave together as warp vs. weft threads of a Talmudic loom which defines the cultures and customs practiced by the chosen Cohen people alone.

         2 Kings 2:11 Elijah is described as being taken up to heaven without dying – illustrates a different understanding of life after death compared to the resurrection concept presented in Xtianity. 2 Kings 2:11, Eliyahu does not die. No burial, no resurrection, no glorified corpse. Eliyahu – removed from the human legal domain, not elevated into divine mediation. Eliyahu returns as messenger, not object of worship. He resolves ספקות, restores halachic clarity. He never annuls mitzvot or introduces new covenants. Malachi 3:23-24 and Sanhedrin 98a Elijah restores clarity to mitzvot, not annuls them.

         Elijah’s experience does not support the Xtian dogma of resurrection but rather suggests other forms of divine interaction with humanity. Xtian dogma of resurrection seen as establishing a ‘new covenant’ between God in Heaven and humanity. This off the path redefinition life, death, and the divine relationship negates the revelation of the tohor spirits of HaShem’s 13 middot living within the Yatzir Ha’Tov of the chosen Cohen people.

         Necromancy traditionally involves summoning the dead for knowledge or power. If one views calling upon JeZeus—who is believed to have risen from the dead—as a form of necromancy, it presents a complex interpretation that challenges conventional understandings. Within Xtian theology, Jesus is not viewed merely as a deceased figure but as the risen Savior who transcends death. This fundamental belief shifts the interaction from necromancy to communion with the living God; a direct violation of the 1st and 2nd Sinai commandments!

         The Xtian ‘New Covenant’ belief in JeZeus’ resurrection – central to Xtian Av tuma false messiah avoda zara which introduces the dogma that JeZeus overcame death and now lives in a glorified state in the Heavens with his Father. This abomination negates: D’varim: לא בשמים היא. The Xtian resurrection witchcraft later spawned Muhammad the false prophet’s 72 virgin theological narishkeit. The prophetic mussar which forbade king David to build the Beit HaMikdash likewise corrupted by inept טיפש פשט Am ha’aretz stupidity.

         Unlike Rambam (Maimonides), who emphasized spiritual immortality in the world to come and interpreted resurrection more cautiously (in his Iggeret Techiyat ha-Metim defending its literalness but subordinating it to intellectual reward), Ramban stresses a more physical, embodied afterlife. He critiques overly spiritualized views, insisting the verse “admits of no other interpretation” than literal resurrection (echoing Rambam’s own defense in his Treatise on Resurrection, though Ramban expands on the mechanics). The mitzva of Moshiach clarifies halacha based upon the precedent of Eliyahu who does the same. The Ramban grounds the סוד concept of resurrection firmly in Torah tradition; it serves divine justice, rewards the righteous (tzaddikim/maskilim who shine like stars, per v. 3), and upholds the 13 middot through tohor judgment—resurrection simply not anything approaching the NT metaphysical elevation of man into God, bypassing halachic courts or Torah observance.

         The Torah mitzva of Moshiach stands upon the Torah precedent of Moshe anointing the House of Aaron as Moshiach – dedicated to drive, lead, guide Israel in a korban like dedication to actively pursue righteous justice among our conflicting peoples within the borders of the oath sworn lands. Just as a koran limited to the confined jurisdiction of the Mishkan so too and how much more so Sanhedrin common law courts, together with their prophetic enforcement police – limited strictly and only to operate within the borders of Judea alone.

         The theological narratives surrounding JeZeus and Muhammad illustrate the complexities of Torah judicial justice as faith apart from the menstrual blood tuma beliefs, and avoda zara spirituality which define the cultures customs and practices developed by European, Arab & Muslim cultures. These Roman and Arab religions share no common ground with Israel brought out of Egypt to conquer Canaan to rule that land with judicial common law justice.

         2 Samuel 11-12 David’s moral failure to judge Uriah the baal of Bat Sheva with justice. David’s attempt to cover up his implied adultery (the Talmud refutes this charge) by recalling Uria from battle – in the hope that he would have relations with his wife forced David to make a far more radical solution to his problem. The concealment of Uriah’s death as a consequence of war – herein defines the language “blood on his hands” by the prophet Natan. Furthermore, the curse of eternal Civil War imposed upon king David. Unlike Shaul whose dedication of the mitzva of Moshiach utterly profaned Natan commanded the mussar that Civil War would persue all generations of king David consequent to the “blood on his hands.”

         The NT false messiah Roman Protocals of the Elders of Zion forgery – totally ignores the key Torah concept of Moshiach as defined to lead the nation in times of “war” (an undefined participle) to rule the land with Judicial courtroom justice which makes fair restitution of damages inflicted by one bnai brit upon another. Hence just as the Sanhedrin Federal Court system defines the נמשל k’vanna of building the Beit Ha-Mikdash משל; absolutely no different from the Mishkan משל to the לא בשמים היא revelation that the tohor 13 Oral Torah middot forever judge the heart of the chosen Cohen people!

         The Torah mitzva of Moshiach the Roman fraudulent NT propaganda cannot substitute itself for any Torah commandment because by the terms of the Apostle Paul – Goyim not under the Law. Just as Goyim cannot negate the mitzva of brit melah so too and how much more so Goyim religions of Av tuma avoda zarah cannot determine the Torah mitzva of Moshiach. The mitzva of Moshiach directly bound, like Yitzak at the Akadah, to the leadership of guiding the people in times of War to not loss faith and fail to pursue righteous judicial justice both among our people and against our enemies in times of crisis or war.

         Loading…

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.